Design critique questions.
71 design critiquequestions from the bank — open to read. Pick one and practice it out loud; a coach note comes back in seconds.
Learn the ideas first
All 71 questions
Critique a typical SaaS pricing page that shows three tiers in equally sized cards with the 'recommended' tier marked with a small badge.Critique a checkout flow where every form field is required and errors only show after submission.Critique a settings page with 8 collapsed sections, each with 5–10 individual toggles, alphabetically ordered.Critique an empty state that says 'No items found. Click here to create one.'Critique a banking app that opens to a marketing carousel before showing account balance.Critique a dashboard where every card has the same visual weight but represents different priorities of information.Critique a sign-up form that uses color alone to indicate which fields have errors.Critique a nav bar with 9 top-level items, three of which open mega menus.Critique a confirmation modal that says 'Are you sure?' with two buttons labeled 'OK' and 'Cancel'.Critique a search results page that surfaces sponsored results above organic results without clear visual distinction.Critique a long-form article page where the article body, sidebar, and footer all use the same body-text size.Critique a settings flow built primarily as a tooltip-driven experience over a complex canvas.Critique an admin tool where the most common task is buried four clicks deep.Critique an onboarding flow that uses 'Welcome aboard!' followed by three paragraphs of mission statement before any user action.Critique a video player whose 'rewatch' affordance is harder to find than the 'autoplay next' affordance.Critique a mobile app whose primary action color competes with a recurring promotional banner color.Critique a calendar widget that lets users navigate months only by tapping small left/right arrows.Critique a B2B tool that hides admin features behind a 'View as admin' toggle in the user's avatar menu.Critique a notification that says 'Update available' as a banner with a 'Learn more' link and no other context.Critique a delete-account flow that requires three confirmations spread across different screens.Critique a financial product's main screen showing balance, recent transactions, and a marketing module — equal weight given to each.Critique an iOS app that uses custom gestures for primary navigation actions without visible affordances.Critique a CRM that puts notes and tasks in separate tabs even though every workflow involves both at once.Critique a SaaS empty-state that says 'You haven't done anything yet. Get started.'Critique a 'getting started' page that pushes the most ambitious feature first when most users have basic needs.Critique a dashboard that prominently displays a 'data quality score' number that most users don't understand.Critique a desktop product where keyboard shortcuts conflict with system shortcuts in two languages.Critique a developer-tool whose docs sit on a separate domain with a different visual language than the product.Critique an error message that says 'Something went wrong. Please try again or contact support.'Critique a fitness app whose home screen leads with leaderboards before personal progress.Critique a mobile menu where all navigation items are displayed in a flat list of 15 links with identical styling and no grouping or visual separation.Critique a button labeled 'Submit' at the end of a multi-step form where users are uploading a portfolio and writing a personal statement.Critique a newsletter signup form where the headline is 24px bold, the input field label is 22px medium, and the submit button text is 20px regular.Critique a recipe app where users can filter by dietary restrictions, but the filter chips disappear when scrolling down the results list.A junior designer hands you a landing page they generated almost entirely with an AI design tool. It looks polished at a glance. Walk me through how your critique of AI-generated work differs from critiquing hand-built work — what do you inspect first?Here's the setup — critique it: an AI assistant renders every answer in the same confident style, whether it's quoting a verified document or generating its own best guess.Critique a dark-mode implementation that simply inverts the existing palette, leaving brand-colored text and icons at low contrast against the new dark surfaces.Critique a design system whose components are pixel-perfect but whose documentation shows only the happy path — no error, loading, overflow, or right-to-left examples.Critique an AI feature whose only affordance is a button labeled 'Generate' — no hint of what will be produced, how long it takes, what it costs, or whether it can be undone.Critique a cookie-consent banner where 'Accept all' is a large filled button and declining requires opening a settings panel and toggling nine categories individually.Critique a quarterly business dashboard chart that uses a dual y-axis to make two unrelated metrics appear to trend together.Critique a voice-first assistant feature that offers no visible transcript and no text-input alternative for users who can't speak or hear in the moment.Critique a product that has added an 'AI' item to its main navigation, gathering every AI-powered capability into one section regardless of which task each one belongs to.Critique a free demo that asks for first name, last name, date of birth, and phone number before the user is allowed to try the product once.Critique an AI writing tool that prints 'Warning: output may contain inaccuracies' beneath every single response, in the same place, in the same gray text.Critique a home screen that reorders its modules on every visit based on AI-predicted relevance, so nothing is ever in the same place twice.Critique a data table that displays 15 columns of financial data with no column freezing, horizontal scroll, or ability to customize which columns are visible.Critique a mobile app's bottom navigation bar that uses five icons without labels, relying solely on iconography to communicate function.Critique a healthcare patient portal where test results are displayed with numerical values but no visual indicators, reference ranges, or plain-language explanations of what the numbers mean.Critique a design system documentation site where component examples are shown only in light mode, with no dark mode variants or theming guidance provided.Critique a B2B SaaS product where every feature is gated behind a 'Book a demo' CTA, with no self-serve trial, product screenshots, or feature documentation available.Critique an error message that reads 'Error code 4028: Operation failed. Contact your administrator.' with no additional context or recovery suggestions.Critique a dashboard chart that uses red and green to indicate stock performance without any additional visual encoding like icons, patterns, or labels.Critique a product page where the primary CTA button, secondary actions, and tertiary links all use the same button style and visual weight.Critique an AI-generated landing page where the hero section uses generic stock photography, placeholder-style copy with no specific value proposition, and a CTA that says 'Get Started Today'.Critique a mobile form where the keyboard covers the active input field and there's no automatic scrolling to keep the field visible above the keyboard.Critique a settings interface where destructive actions like 'Delete Account' and 'Clear Data' are placed at the top of the page with the same visual treatment as non-destructive settings.Critique a multi-step onboarding flow that shows a progress indicator with 5 steps, but the actual experience includes 9 screens before completion.Critique a data visualization that plots time-series data but uses a truncated Y-axis starting at 85 instead of 0, making small variations appear dramatic.Critique a component library where button variants include 'primary', 'secondary', 'tertiary', 'ghost', 'outline', 'text', and 'link' with no clear guidance on when to use each.Critique a notification center that groups notifications by type (Messages, Updates, Alerts) but shows the oldest items first within each group.Critique a loading state that displays an animated spinner for 3+ seconds with no indication of what's loading or how long it might take.Critique an AI-generated user profile page that includes fields for 'Synergy Score', 'Engagement Velocity', and other metrics that sound impressive but have no clear definition or user value.Critique a responsive design where desktop shows a three-column layout but mobile stacks all content in the same order, burying the primary CTA below the fold.Critique a video player interface where all controls (play, volume, settings, fullscreen) disappear after 2 seconds of inactivity with no keyboard shortcuts documented.Critique a filter panel with 12 different filter types where applying any filter immediately triggers a page reload instead of allowing users to combine multiple filters before searching.Critique a success message that appears as a green toast notification in the bottom-right corner for 2 seconds after a user completes a 15-minute form submission.Critique a comparison table where feature names are technical specifications (e.g., 'SSO via SAML 2.0') with no tooltips or plain-language descriptions for non-technical buyers.Critique a line chart showing patient health metrics over time where the line color changes based on whether values are in a healthy range, creating a multi-colored line that's difficult to trace.Critique an AI-generated checkout flow that includes unnecessary steps like 'Review Your Cart' as a separate page even though the cart is visible in the header throughout the experience.Critique a design system where color tokens are named by their hex values (e.g., 'color-2E7D32') rather than semantic names or their intended use in the interface.